Finger Pointing

The Republicans are Experts

The recently failed attempt, by an Al-Qaida operative, to bring down an international flight while landing in Detroit, has sparked the Republican Party to attempt an “I told you so” campaign. While criticizing Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, (I have to admit, I am doubtful of her abilities as well) the party of NO, seems to have memory loss, when it comes to who originated DHS and the rules they play by today. It was the Republican Administration of George W. Bush and his fellow criminals who, in 2003, established what some have nicknamed the “Homeboy Security Department”. This farce of a Governmental Agency is supposed to bring together, all intelligence gathered information, so that data can be shared and used for the protection of the American People. However, two of the most important organizations are not bound under Homeland Security Rule; the departments are the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Now, I realize the lack of involvement by these two agencies should not hurt the overall performance of DHS but, it is quite apparent, Homeland Security is falling way short of the intended results it was created to achieve.

The Republican attempt to disparage the present administration will probably fall short. President Obama did not rise up through the politics of Chicago without learning a thing or two about reaction. The following is an article appearing in the Guardian which seems to place the event in perspective; http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/dec/30/us-plots-retaliatory-strikes-yemen
US plots retaliatory strikes against al-Qaida in Yemen over plane bomber
Chris McGreal in Washington, Nasser Arrabyee in Sana'a, and Hugh Macleod guardian.co.uk,
The US is planning retaliatory strikes in Yemen against al-Qaida over its attempt to blow up a transatlantic flight on Christmas Day.
American officials say intelligence efforts are focused on identifying and tracking down those who plotted to put Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab on the plane with enough explosive in his underwear to bring down the Northwest Airlines flight from Amsterdam. But they warn that finding those responsible is unlikely to be swift and say that identifying other "high-value" al-Qaida targets for retaliatory attack would also be a priority.
"First we have to find out who put Abdulmutallab on the plane with the bomb," said a US official working alongside intelligence organizations. "He's providing some leads and we're not dealing with an unknown quantity here. We've been watching and listening to what goes on in Yemen and we may have pieces of the puzzle already and just need to fit it together.
"If and when we identify them then we plan how to deal with them. Who they are is one thing, where they are is another.If they're still in Yemen and we can get a lock on them then it won't be too difficult to know what to do. But they know who they are and won't be standing out. After that we can move with the president's authorization. I don't think there's much doubt that authorization will be forthcoming, but no one should think all of this is going to happen overnight."
The official acknowledged that there was likely to be political and public pressure on Barack Obama to strike back at al-Qaida, particularly with Republican opponents breaking with the usual solidarity on national security issues to accuse him of weakness and making America vulnerable to attack.
"The people we want are the ones who put Abdulmutallab on the plane. Until we can get them there are other high-value targets that will make the point that attacking America does not go unpunished," said the official.
But given the regular attacks against al-Qaida in Yemen, these may have a greater impact on American public opinion than on the extremist group.
The US has been conducting a covert assault with drone attacks on al-Qaida bases for about a year, while CIA agents inside the country help direct ground operations. American Special Forces have been training the Yemeni military and may have been involved in raids.
General David Petraeus, the American regional commander, and John Brennan, the president's counterterrorism adviser, both visited Yemen this year.
Joe Lieberman, chairman of the Senate's homeland security committee, who visited Yemen in August, described the country this week as a focus of the assault on al-Qaida. "Yemen now becomes one of the centers of that fight. We have a growing presence there – and we have to – of special operations, Green Berets, intelligence," he said.
Yesterday, Yemeni forces targeted Nasser Ahmed al-Ahdal; a former prisoner released after renouncing violence but believed to have renewed links to al-Qaida. One man was injured and captured but Ahdal and two others escaped.
Several al-Qaida members killed in raids by Yemeni forces in the past fortnight had been released or had escaped from prison. Others who have left jail to rejoin the fight include Nasser al-Wahayshi, the Yemeni leader of al-Qaida, who escaped along with 22 others from prison in Yemen in 2006. His deputy, Saeed al-Shihri, joined al-Qaida in Yemen last year after being released to Saudi Arabia from Guantánamo.
While intelligence officials plan how to hit back abroad, they are under pressure at home after Obama blamed intelligence failings for Abdulmutallab being allowed to board a plane to the US. The president has ordered that a preliminary report be delivered to him today tomorrow explaining how the young Nigerian managed to smuggle the explosives on to the flight.
The criticism is focused on the CIA and the national counterterrorism centre (NCC) established after 9/11. The CIA is under scrutiny because it picked up intelligence from Yemen that a Nigerian was involved in a forthcoming attack at about the same time that Abdulmutallab's father told US diplomats in the Nigerian capital, Abuja, that his son had become radicalized in Yemen and was a possible threat. That information was shared with CIA officials in Abuja who passed it on to the NCC, but it was apparently not matched with the intelligence from Yemen. On Tuesday Obama condemned the failure to share information and other intelligence failings as "totally unacceptable".
CIA in the line of fire
First the finger was pointed at Janet Napolitano, the homeland security secretary, who blundered after the failure of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab's bombing attempt by saying "the system worked".
But with Barack Obama condemning intelligence failures as "totally unacceptable", attention is focused on the CIA and the national counterterrorism centre (NCC), set up after 9/11 to pool information and forestall the kind of plot that Abdulmutallab came close to completing.
The CIA is under pressure after it was revealed that it apparently had two important pieces of the puzzle that might have prevented the attack and did not put them together.
The New York Times said the agency picked up intelligence from Yemen that a Nigerian was at the forefront of a looming attack on American interests. At about the same time, the CIA was part of a briefing at the US embassy in Nigeria after Abdulmutallab's father warned American diplomats that his son was becoming radicalized, and was in Yemen. The CIA drew up a file, but then sat on it for five weeks.
For its part, the NCC was told by the state department about the warnings by Abdulmutallab's father, but then did not check whether the young Nigerian had a US visa. He did.
The president described the handling of the warning as a failure.
Richard Clarke, a former chief counter‑terrorism adviser on the US national security council, said that while Napolitano is feeling the heat for a political misstep, it was the CIA and NCC that should shoulder responsibility. "There does appear to be a failure here either at the CIA or the new national counterterrorism centre. Homeland security didn't get the information. I think the problem lies at the intelligence community and not at homeland security," he said

In the end, I believe the Republican Party is once again, kicking a dead horse and needs to address their internal party problems before they try to convince the American People to trust them again. With our armed forces deployed in the area and the readiness to retaliate, Yemen would do themselves a favor to rid their country of Al-Qaida before we decide to do it for them. Ask Iraq and Afghanistan if that is not a wise decision in hindsight.

That’s How I See It.

Websites of reference;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeland_security
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janet_Napolitano
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/02/11/emergency.supplies/
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/dec/30/us-plots-retaliatory-strikes-yemen
http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2009/12/30/yemen-terrorism.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yemen
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091229/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_yemen_us_airliner_attack
www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6031772n